The Practice Training Contracts application form and listings for openings now reside in our Careers Portal. Law practices may refer to the Careers Portal to submit a vacancy listing for practice trainees (this service is free of fees). Practice trainees looking for positions may also refer to the Careers Portal to view the Practice Training Contracts listings.
Law practices should note that Relevant Legal Training positions should not be advertised under the Practice Training Contracts category. Relevant Legal Training positions should be advertised under “Post Job Ad” and will be subject to advertising fees.
To understand the elementary terms of a practice training contract, please refer to our sample practice training contract here.
Law graduates who are seeking to practise law and need advice are welcome to approach the Law Society. While we cannot provide job placement or secondment services, we can offer career counselling, mentorship, guidance, referrals and practical tips. Please write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org and we will get back to you.
Guidelines for Supervising Solicitors on Charging out for Trainee’s Contributions
These guidelines address the question of whether a law practice is entitled to charge out for the value of their practice trainees’ contribution. The guidelines are not meant to be an advisory or a Practice Direction but simply an aide-memoire if a law practice chooses to charge out for work done by its practice trainee. The Law Society is not making it compulsory or obligatory for law practices to charge out for work done, contributions made or time clocked in by a practice trainee.
Over the years, the relationship between supervising solicitor and practice trainee has evolved. It has moved from an apprenticeship-style relationship between pupil and pupil master to a relationship with the character of employer-employee. Practice trainees want some certainty during their Practice Training Period (‘PTP‘) that their work is recognised and they add value to the law practice. Similarly, supervising solicitors and law practices want to give due recognition to the practice trainee for work done. This does not mean the profession is abandoning its traditional paradigmatic pupil/pupil-master relationship. It is recognising the evolving nature of that relationship with a longer and more rigorous PTP from 2023 and preparing itself for the future.
Charging out for the value of practice trainees’ contribution is consistent with the incremental approach to training under the proposed training framework of the Committee on the Professional Training of Lawyers, set to be in place by 2023. The Report published by the Committee on the Professional Training of Lawyers (‘the Report’) recognises that the inability to charge out for the practice trainee’s time is a strain on the law practice’s resources especially with the PTP set to double from six months to one year in 2023. Giving the law practice the option to charge out for work done by their practice trainee eases the burden of taking on trainees especially for smaller law practices. It might even encourage more practitioners to become supervising solicitors. This will engender a greater sense of belonging, nurturing and guidance within the profession which in turn will facilitate the transmission of values from supervising solicitors to practice trainees, ensuring practice trainees who eventually become practitioners maintain the high standards that the public expects of an Advocate & Solicitor.
Furthermore, as clients are generally cost-conscious, they might be willing to pay for work done by a practice trainee in lieu of for example, an associate doing the same job. There are also “equity” practice trainees who are quick on the take from the word go and who would be strongly adding value to files whether on research, drafting or discovery. The important touchstone however is that it must be clearly explained to the client in advance that that a practice trainee will be apprenticing (under supervision) on the file for which the client will be charged. The Letter of Engagement should clearly and transparently explain this and also set out the basis for the charge (which should be rational e.g. hourly rates or a premium to the supervising solicitors’ rates to recognise the trainee’s work). If the client being so apprised, and agreeable for the practice trainee to contribute to the file, it will be a potentially win-win-win outcome for all three parties – the client, the supervising solicitor and the practice trainee.
For the foregoing reasons, the Council is of the view that a rigid policy cast in stone of not charging out for work done by a practice trainee belongs to antiquity. While there is no denying the purity of the apprenticeship and the fundamental nature of the training contract which is training, the time has come to recognise the dignity and value of our trainees during the PTP in a more meaningful way.
First, we look at the benefit to all stakeholders on charging-out for trainees’ work and then address some of the questions you might have. We have also included a sample practice training contract for your perusal and adoption/adaptation if appropriate.
Taking on practice trainees can be a costly affair for some smaller law practices. Allowing the law practice to charge out for their practice trainee’s contribution can help defray the cost of hiring a trainee.
If the practice trainee knows the client is aware he/she will be working on the file under the guidance of the supervising solicitor, while there is still on-the-job training, this could serve as an incentive to put in quality work. The benefit to the supervising solicitor is a higher standard of work from the practice trainee and a boost in the efficiency levels of the firm.
The understanding that his/her contribution and work adds value to the management of the file gives the practice trainee the assurance that they are more than just ‘cheap labour’. It recognises the dignity and worth of the practice trainee (as a valuable team member) and the value of their contribution. It could also secondarily, engender a trusting relationship between the practice trainee and the law practice.
Charging out for trainee’s contribution sends the signal that we as a profession value our practice trainees and that they belong to the profession from day one of their practice traineeship. From 2023, the 12 month PTP allows supervising solicitors a much longer period to transmit knowledge, skills and even expertise to their practice trainees. These 12 months afford an invaluable runway to practice trainees to develop their skills and be an integral part of the legal profession.
As a practice trainee’s billable hours will be less costly than an Associate’s, some clients might opt to have a practice trainee work on their matter instead of an Associate (especially for research, discovery, etc). It increases flexibility of choices available to the client. The charge out rates of a Senior Counsel, Partner, Associate and practice trainee are different. It is important to list the charge out rates upfront so the client is aware of the difference from the outset. The client cannot subsequently remonstrate that he or she is dealing with a practice trainee instead of a Partner as the client would have gone into the engagement with eyes wide open. Of course, in some cases, the client may expect a waiver of any charge for the value, work or time of a practice trainee but this is a function of market economics and the bargaining power between client and solicitor for individual matters.
Charging out for a practice trainee’s contributions sends the message to the public that practice trainees are a valued part of the legal profession. They are not orphaned, economic digits handpicked to provide free labour under the guise of practice training only to be discarded at will after the end of the practice traineeship. Practice trainees belong.
From our research, we note that law firms in Hong Kong publish their trainee solicitors’ rates at about one third of the charge of a 10 year PQE solicitor. A rational and logical approach is something between a legal executive’s charge out rate and a first year lawyer’s hourly rate.
If it is explained clearly and transparently to the client that the practice trainee will be part of the team managing the file, this situation should not practically arise. It is the responsibility of the supervising solicitor to make this crystal clear to the client in the Letter of Engagement and during preliminary discussions with the client.
In discussions with your client, it must be explicitly stated that the individual is a practice trainee and his/her work is fully supervised by a qualified advocate and solicitor. Clearly and transparently state that the practice trainee will be working on the file. This must also be explicitly stated in the Letter of Engagement.
Your law practice should not hold out the practice trainee as an Advocate & Solicitor and should ensure that the practice trainee is properly supervised. Your practice trainee should not be allowed to practise law as a fully-fledged lawyer as that would court risk. Emphasising that the practice trainee remains a trainee and is neither qualified nor authorised to act as a qualified Advocate & Solicitor will prevent a breach of s.33. We recommend that you include this in your Letter of Engagement to nip any misperceptions on the practice trainee’s role in the bud.
The practice trainee’s charge out rate should obviously not be the same as that of an Associate. The lower charge out rate for the practice trainee is a supporting indicator that they are not a full-fledged professional.
If there is a clear employer-employee relationship, CPF obligations arise. The CPF Board views the PTP as an apprenticeship, thus no CPF obligation will arise unless the employer-employee relationship is established.
If there is a clear employer-employee relationship, certain terms of the Employment Act will be statutorily implied such as leave and medical benefits.
No it does not. However, in the interests of fairness to our practice trainees and ensuring that the fundamental obligation owed by supervising solicitors to train practice trainees is not derogated from, we urge all supervising solicitors to sign a training contract with their practice trainees. Such a contract will crystallise the practice trainee’s rights and obligations during the PTP.
No, it is not obligatory. Charging out for the value of the practice trainee’s contributions, work or time is only one means of recognising the worth of your practice trainee’s contribution. Law firms may have other ideas of affirming the dignity and worth of practice trainee (both tangible and intangible).
Click here for the sample practice training contract.